Field development plan project. Field development plan project.
| Heriot-Watt Institute of Petroleum Engineering PE Design Project Marking Criteria and Scoring Guide (after Couples) | ||||||
| Marks (%) | ||||||
| Performance Areas | 70-100 | 60-69 | 50-59 | 40-49 | <30 | |
| Geology (9 marks) | Provides a clear and complete statement of the depositional environment and structure of the reservoir, including those factors that have a significant impact on the remainder of the study
| Provides an adequate statement of the depositional environment and structure of the reservoir, including some of the factors that have other impacts on the study
| Provides a just-adequate description of the depositional environment and structure of the reservoir, with little evidence that the wider impacts are understood
| Provides an inadequate description of the depositional environment and structure of the reservoir, with no evidence that the wider impacts are understood
| Provides a very inadequate description of the depositional environment and structure of the reservoir
| |
| Formation Evaluation (7 marks) | Demonstrates complete competence in making petrophysical interpretations and predictions, and explores the role of uncertainties and the consequences of alternative approaches
| Demonstrates good competence in making petrophysical interpretations and predictions, and shows evidence of an appreciation of the role of uncertainties or of alternative approaches
| Demonstrates competence in making petrophysical interpretations and predictions, but shows little evidence of appreciation of the role of uncertainties or of alternative approaches
| Demonstrates only questionable competence in making petrophysical interpretations and predictions, with no evidence of broader thinking
| Demonstrates a lack of competence in making petrophysical interpretations and predictions.
| |
| Reservoir Engineering (14 marks) | Comprehensive use of well-test data, fluid and rock properties, and simulation to assess dynamic behaviour of reservoir
| Appropriate use of well-test data, fluid and rock properties, and simulation to assess dynamic behaviour of reservoir
| Adequate use of well-test data, fluid and rock properties, and simulation to assess dynamic behaviour of reservoir
| Limited use of well-test data, fluid and rock properties, and simulation to assess dynamic behaviour of reservoir
| Little use of well-test data, fluid and rock properties, and simulation to assess dynamic behaviour of reservoir
| |
| Drilling Engineering (5 marks) | Comprehensive use of engineering data to design mud, cement, hydraulics and drilling system
| Appropriate use of engineering data to design mud, cement, hydraulics and drilling system
| Adequate use of engineering data to design mud, cement, hydraulics and drilling system
| Limited use of engineering data to design mud, cement, hydraulics and drilling system
| Little use of engineering data to design mud, cement, hydraulics and drilling system
| |
| Production Technology (7 marks) | Comprehensive use of engineering data to design bottomhole, completion string, surface facilities, including control and management of the production/injection
| Appropriate use of engineering data to design bottomhole, completion string, surface facilities, including control and management of the production/injection
| Adequate use of engineering data to design bottomhole, completion string, surface facilities, including control and management of the production/injection
| Limited use of engineering data to design bottomhole, completion string, surface facilities, including control and management of the production/injection.
| Little use of engineering data to design bottomhole, completion string, surface facilities, including control and management of the production/injection
| |
| Commercial Analysis (7 marks) | Demonstrates thorough understanding of the capital and operating costs associated with chosen developments
| Demonstrates adequate understanding of the capital and operating costs associated with chosen developments
| Demonstrates some understanding of the capital and operating costs associated with chosen developments
| Demonstrates limited understanding of the capital and operating costs associated with chosen developments
| Demonstrates little understanding of the capital and operating costs associated with chosen developments
| |
| Reservoir & Well Management/Monitoring, i.e. Production Plan (2 marks) | Demonstrates thorough understanding of analysis of uncertainty related to production scenarios of the reservoir and development of production plan
| Demonstrates adequate understanding of analysis of uncertainty related to production scenarios of the reservoir and development of production plan
| Demonstrates some understanding of analysis of uncertainty related to production scenarios of the reservoir and development of production plan
| Demonstrates limited understanding of analysis of uncertainty related to production scenarios of the reservoir and development of production plan
| Demonstrates little understanding of analysis of uncertainty related to production scenarios of the reservoir and development of production plan
| |
| Environmental Impact and Abatement, and Decommissioning (7 marks) | Demonstrates thorough understanding of environmental factors associated with exploration and production
| Demonstrates adequate understanding of environmental factors associated with exploration and production
| Demonstrates some understanding of environmental factors associated with exploration and production
| Demonstrates limited understanding of environmental factors associated with exploration and production
| Demonstrates little understanding of environmental factors associated with exploration and production
| |
| Report Integration and Quality (13 marks) | Assembling the information in a new way. Rigorous interpretation of data Executive summary, contents, conclusions, and figures well laid out. Right length. Enjoyable and easy to read. Group success evidenced by fully-integrated nature of report.
| Assembling the information in an efficient but not novel way. Sound interpretation of data. Good layout, good use of figs and captions. Well written. Patchy evidence of group interactions.
| A reasonable effort at assembling the information. Little interpretation of data or inter-relationships. Good figs and captions, but poor layout. Adequate, but dull, use of English. Little evidence of group interactions and integration.
| No evidence of thought going into the arrangement of the material. No interpretation of data. Poor layout. Sloppy location of figs. No or sloppy captions. Weak sentence/paragraph construction. No clear evidence of group interactions.
| Very poorly assembled information. Data wrongly interpreted. No lay out. Wrong length. Very sloppy use of English. Group breakdown indicated by misinformation and inconsistent data.
|
p(20)
Place your order now to enjoy great discounts on this or a similar topic.
People choose us because we provide:
Essays written from scratch, 100% original,
Delivery within deadlines,
Competitive prices and excellent quality,
24/7 customer support,
Priority on their privacy,
Unlimited free revisions upon request, and
Plagiarism free work,
Field development plan project
Field development plan project
For a custom paper on the above or a related topic or instructions, place your order now!
What We Offer:
• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content
