NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form

NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form. NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form. Criteria HIGH DN
85 – 100% DISTINCTION
75%- 84% CREDIT
65% – 74% P1
55% – 64% P2
50% – 54% F1
49%- 40% F2
39%-0

PART A As for DN AND

Exceptional, analytical background arguments and RQ
(referenced)

Five exemplary key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).

Demonstrates original thought, exceptional analysis of 4 primary research papers.

Exceptional critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant.

Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates exceptional integration of relevant additional literature.

Exceptional critical recommendations.
As for CR AND

Comprehensive background and research question (referenced).

Five highly applicable key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).

Comprehensive, in-depth critical understanding and analysis of 4 primary research papers

Comprehensive
implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant

Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates high level integration of relevant additional literature, impressive.

Innovative recommendations.
As for P1 AND

Thorough, detailed description of background and research question (referenced).

Five thorough, detailed key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).

Advanced critical analysis of outcomes from 4 primary research papers.

Thorough, detailed critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant

Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates thorough, detailed integration of more than 3 relevant additional literature sources.

Thorough, detailed recommendations. Adequately completed all components of assignment. Competent, accurate description of background and research question (referenced).

Four primary research articles listed correctly.

Five relevant key messages synthesised from the primary research papers (referenced).

Adequate critical analysis of 4 primary research papers.

Adequate, accurate critical implementation of results to improve practice and research, education, policy, as relevant

Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates adequate use of 3 relevant additional literature sources.
Some descriptive level critical analysis.

Adequate recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Limited basic, mostly accurate description of background & research question (referenced).

Four primary research articles listed correctly.

Some repetition, some superficial elements in the 5 key messages synthesised from 4 primary research papers (referenced).

Basic understanding

Superficial analysis of 4 primary research papers.

Limited basic implementation of results to improve practice and other areas, as relevant
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates limited/basic use of less than 3 relevant additional literature sources

Mostly descriptive – minimal critical analysis.

Limited and /or basic recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Unclear, poor, inaccurate description of background and RQ / / RQ. missing
No references

Less than 4 primary research articles listed.

Less than four relevant or incorrect key messages from 4 or less than 4 primary research papers (problems with referencing).

Poor and/or unrelated
analysis of 4 or less than 4 primary research papers. Not critical.

Poor, inadequate and/or unrelated,
implementation of results for practice and other areas,

No additional relevant literature

Irrelevant recommendations for practice, research, education, policy As for F1 AND

Did not complete most
assignment components

Incorrect irrelevant
missing
content in sections

Explanations missing, lacking
not supported.

No references

PART B
(500 words) As for DN AND

Exceptional critique and exemplary understanding of how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.

Sophisticated ability to integrate an impressive range of relevant literature.
As for CR AND

In-depth critique & comprehensive understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.

Discussion supported by wide range of relevant literature.

As for P1 AND

Thorough, detailed critique and insightful understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.

Discussion supported by more than 3 sources of relevant literature.
Presents adequate critique & sound understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence practice as a new RN.

Discussion supported by 2-3 sources of relevant literature from the course.

3rd person writing Limited, basic description and understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence practice as a new RN. Some lack of clarity, minimal depth.

No additional relevant literature.

3rd person writing
No images Poor and/or unrelated description about how course learning will influence the student’s practice as a new RN.

Referred to their own project OR other courses

No relevant literature used.

1st person writing
Images used As for F1 AND

Unclear

Missing

Irrelevant

Overall
quality of
writing

Poster presentation As for DN, plus
Exceptional creative flair in layout; impressive use of colour.

Succinctly expresses insightful and original thought using exemplary poster presentation skills.

Adheres to all writing guidelines.

As for Credit, plus
Impressive creative flair in layout; fonts; use of colour.

Succinctly expresses ideas high impact images and poster presentation skills.

Adheres to all writing guidelines

As for Pass 1, plus
Visually appealing and competently prepared in layout; use of colour,

Very relevant images

Adheres to all writing guidelines

Satisfactory appeal, effective layout; use of colour.
Appropriate use and size of images in Part A – no more than 20% of text box

Adheres to most writing guidelines in Part B re: sentence structure, grammar, spelling, use of 3rd person, use of inclusive language,
mostly sequenced, logical flow. Basic layout; some problems with fonts and use of colour.

Some images irrelevant
Images so small – can’t see detail, so irrelevant

Images had limited impact

Too much text.

Vague, limited
Inadequate lacking in clarity in some areas

Problems in Part B with: sentence structure,
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, use of 3rd person, inclusive language, flow Poorly presented, little appeal busy, difficult to read due to problems with font and colour.

No images

All images irrelevant

No connection to research question.
Poor logic

Template altered
Sections deleted.
Did not adhere to most writing guidelines 1st person

Below word limit 2016 Template not used.
No logic

Incoherent writing style, grammatical spelling errors.

Adheres to few guidelines.

Significantly below word limit

Referencing & Academic Integrity
Adherence
to UniSA (date) Harvard author-date system As for Credit As for Credit Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing and Reference List Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, with no evidence of plagiarism. Few minor errors

Reference list is complete, mostly correct formatting.
No omissions. Mostly correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, no evidence of plagiarism.

Reference list has some inconsistencies in formatting and omissions
In-text referencing is incomplete.
Reference list incorrect or incomplete. Some evidence of plagiarism.

Possible referral to AIO No references in text. No reference list.
Evidence of extensive plagiarism

This Assessment 2 is worth 55% of your final grade and the equivalent of 2,500 words. The word equivalent means that the work you do to complete this assignment is taken into account so the total word count in the 3 slides will be less than 2,500 actual words.

You are required to develop a power point slide (Part A) that could be presented as a poster to disseminate the results of your research project. You will identify five (5) key messages and the implementation of results for practice. In Part B, you will discuss what you have learned in Nursing Project and how you think this knowledge will influence your practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse.

Objectives being assessed:
CO 4 – Identify the implications and make recommendations for nursing
CO 5 – Design a poster presentation in order to disseminate findings

Your assignment must adhere to the following format:
– Download the Assignment 2 template located in the Assessments folder to use.
– Do Not re-format the Template in any way or add any additional slides.
– Part B: use 1.5 spacing, write in 3rd person, and use references as relevant.
– Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing and Reference List.

ASSIGNMENT 2 TEMPLATE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS:
Part A: Slide: (1200 words equivalent)
Include the following information in the specified areas and reference correctly:
– Project Title and your name and student ID
– Introduction, background, research question.
– List five (5) relevant key messages from your research project results.
– Discuss implementation of results for clinical practice and/or education and policy in relation to your research question.
– Recommendations for clinical practice and/or research, education and policy.
– Use 3-4 images if relevant. No more than 20% of the size in the text box.

Part B (500 words approx)
Think about what you have learned in Nursing Project. Describe how you think this knowledge will influence your clinical practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse. Write in 3rd person and use references as relevant.

Reference List: Present on a new slide and use correct UniSA Harvard author-date

NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form

NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic or instructions, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

clinical interest/the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?

clinical interest/the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?. clinical interest/the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?. Criteria:
1. Identify an area of clinical interest
2. Find one peer-reviewed journal article (no older than 5 years) related to your clinical topic of interest. Do not use a meta-analysis or systematic review.
3. Critique the journal article, fully answering the following questions
4. This critique should be 3-4 pages (not including the cover page and reference page)
5. Utilize the APA levels of headings on page 62 of the APA Manual- APA MANUAL
6. APA formatting required (Include appropriate APA level/headings)

Ethical Aspects of a Study Were adequate steps taken to safeguard participant’s privacy?
How was confidentiality maintained?
Were vulnerable groups involved in research?
If yes, were special precautions instituted because of their vulnerable status?
Research Tradition Was the research tradition for the study identified?
If none was identified, can one be inferred? Are the data sources, research methods and analytic approach congruent with the research tradition?
Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design?
Sampling What type of sampling strategy was used?
Are sampling procedures clearly delineated in the study?
Data Collection Given the research question and characteristics of study participants, did the researcher use the best method of capturing study phenomena (self-reports, observation)?
If self-report methods, did the researcher make good decisions about the specific method used to solicit information (focus group interviews, critical incident interviews)?
Were interviews tape recorded and transcribed?
What methods of data collection were utilized (Self-reports, Scales, Observation, and Rating Scales)? If self-report methods were used, did the researchers make good decisions about specific methods (in-person interviews, mailed questionnaires, etc.)?

Clinical Practice Did the researchers discuss the study’s implications for clinical practice or future research and if so, were the implications grounded in the study evidence, and in evidence from earlier research?

Guidelines for Scholarly Research Critique: QUALITATIVE ARTICLE

Title Was the title a good one, suggesting the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?
Abstract Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report?
Introduction Is the phenomenon of interest clearly identified?
Is the problem stated unambiguously?

Literature Review Does the report summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest?
Is the literature review adequate?
Does the literature review lay a solid basis for the new study
Research Questions Are research questions explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?
Method
Research design and research tradition Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

Sample and setting Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?
Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?
Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

Data collection and measure Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?
Was a sufficient amount of data gathered? Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?
Procedures Were data collection and recording procedures adequately described and do they appear appropriate?
Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias or behavioral distortions? Were data collection staff appropriately trained?
Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?
Enhancement of rigor Did the researcher document research procedures and decision processes sufficiently that findings are auditable and confirmable?
Results
Data Analysis Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described?
Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?
Did the analysis yield an appropriate product (e.g., theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern, etc.)?
Did the analytic procedure suggest the possibility of biases?
Findings Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of experts?
Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?
Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?
Theoretical Integration Are the themes or patterns logically connected to each other to form a convincing and integrated whole?
Were figures, maps, or models used effectively to summarize conceptualizations?
Discussion Are the findings interpreted within an appropriate social or cultural context?
Are major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior studies?
Are the implications consistent with the study’s limitations?
Does the report address the issue of transferability of the findings?
Implications/Recommendations Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or future inquiry-and are those implications reasonable?
Global Issue Was the report well-written, well-organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?
Was the description of the methods, findings, and interpretations sufficiently rich and vivid?
Summary Assessment Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy-do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline

Qualitative Mini Critique Due (10 points)
Criteria:
1. Identify an area of clinical interest
2. Find one peer-reviewed journal article (no older than 5 years) related to your clinical topic of interest. Do not use a meta-analysis or systematic review.
3. Critique the journal article, fully answering the following questions
4. This critique should be 3-4 pages (not including the cover page and reference page)
5. Utilize the APA levels of headings on page 62 of the APA Manual- APA MANUAL
6. APA formatting required (Include appropriate APA level/headings)
Ethical Aspects of a Study Were adequate steps taken to safeguard participant’s privacy?
How was confidentiality maintained?
Were vulnerable groups involved in research?
If yes, were special precautions instituted because of their vulnerable status?
Research Tradition Was the research tradition for the study identified?
If none was identified, can one be inferred? Are the data sources, research methods and analytic approach congruent with the research tradition?
Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design?
Sampling What type of sampling strategy was used?
Are sampling procedures clearly delineated in the study?
Data Collection Given the research question and characteristics of study participants, did the researcher use the best method of capturing study phenomena (self-reports, observation)?
If self-report methods, did the researcher make good decisions about the specific method used to solicit information (focus group interviews, critical incident interviews)?
Were interviews tape recorded and transcribed?
What methods of data collection were utilized (Self-reports, Scales, Observation, and Rating Scales)? If self-report methods were used, did the researchers make good decisions about specific methods (in-person interviews, mailed questionnaires, etc.)?

Clinical Practice Did the researchers discuss the study’s implications for clinical practice or future research and if so, were the implications grounded in the study evidence, and in evidence from earlier research?

Guidelines for Scholarly Research Critique: QUALITATIVE ARTICLE

Title Was the title a good one, suggesting the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?
Abstract Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report?
Introduction Is the phenomenon of interest clearly identified?
Is the problem stated unambiguously?

Literature Review Does the report summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest?
Is the literature review adequate?
Does the literature review lay a solid basis for the new study
Research Questions Are research questions explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?
Method
Research design and research tradition Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

Sample and setting Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?
Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?
Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

Data collection and measure Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?
Was a sufficient amount of data gathered? Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?
Procedures Were data collection and recording procedures adequately described and do they appear appropriate?
Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias or behavioral distortions? Were data collection staff appropriately trained?
Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?
Enhancement of rigor Did the researcher document research procedures and decision processes sufficiently that findings are auditable and confirmable?
Results
Data Analysis Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described?
Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?
Did the analysis yield an appropriate product (e.g., theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern, etc.)?
Did the analytic procedure suggest the possibility of biases?
Findings Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of experts?
Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?
Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?
Theoretical Integration Are the themes or patterns logically connected to each other to form a convincing and integrated whole?
Were figures, maps, or models used effectively to summarize conceptualizations?
Discussion Are the findings interpreted within an appropriate social or cultural context?
Are major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior studies?
Are the implications consistent with the study’s limitations?
Does the report address the issue of transferability of the findings?
Implications/Recommendations Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or future inquiry-and are those implications reasonable?
Global Issue Was the report well-written, well-organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?
Was the description of the methods, findings, and interpretations sufficiently rich and vivid?
Summary Assessment Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy-do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline

clinical interest/the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?

clinical interest/the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic or instructions, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content