Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study

Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study. Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study. Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study with the USA child custody rights i want some cases in the research and a lot of references.

The research project must be submitted according to the following guidelines:

Format of Work

Assignments must be in the following format:

The front page must consist of a completed cover sheet. See the Blackboard.
All pages should be in black type, on white A4 paper, printed on one side only with 3 cm margins on all sides (left, right, top, bottom).
The font size must be 12 point font using the ‘Times’ font and line spacing should be ‘double spaced’.
Pages must be numbered.
Insert a Table of contents
Bibliography/ books/Articles/ Other sources.
Use footnote for clarification, definition, legislation, case law, examples, and any other secondary information which support your point.
Always keep an electronic copy of your work.
Assignments must conform to adequate reference and citation practice .
You have to choose one topic that you are interested in from those listed on the syllabus.
You should discuss the topic with me before you begin writing your research.
I must approve your chosen topic before you start writing.
The content of the research must show that knowledge has been gained and that you can analyze, apply, synthesize and present that knowledge.

The length of the research project is between 8000 and 20,000 words (30-80 pages)
You must use academic sources and E-Resources including LexisNexis.
You are encouraged to submit the first half of your work or the first draft to me for comments, corrections and instructions before the final submission.
Every citation made in the body of the research must appear in the Bibliography.
Exercise critical thinking and judgment
Present information in an organized and logical sequence
Use your own words and ideas as far as possible supported by academic literature and evidence.
Marking Criteria

Outstanding

(36 -40)

Deep understanding of general subject area, significant originality in research aims and question. High level of ability in appropriate analytical and/or interpretative techniques. Coherent structure and overwhelming evidence of in-depth reading. Excellent critical synthesis and strong integration with wider theoretical issues. Professionally presented, referencing and bibliography of standard of journal article in subject area. An incisive and fluent style, with no or very minor errors of spelling, punctuation or grammar. Students demonstrate excellent search strategies to find relevant, scholarly information, including a wide range of resources to obtain that information.

Good

(30 -35)

Clear understanding of general subject area and clear statement of research aims and questions. Generally effective levels of ability in appropriate analytical and/or interpretative techniques. Coherent structure and shows clear evidence of in-depth reading, demonstrating synthesis of secondary materials, and awareness of wider theoretical issues. Well-presented, with detailed referencing in an acceptable style and a properly formatted bibliography. Fluent style, with few errors of spelling, punctuation or grammar. Students demonstrate good search strategies to find relevant, scholarly information, including a number of resources other than supplied/recommended readings.

Adequate

(20-29)

Basic understanding of general subject area and a simple statement of research aims and questions. Familiarity with the appropriate analytical and/or interpretative techniques, but may show some errors in the process of analysis or interpretation. Adequate structure and some evidence of further reading of secondary materials, but often in the form of a general literature review rather than a synthesis of material directly relevant to the research aims. Adequately presented, with some referencing of sources and a short bibliography. Straightforward style, and may include some errors of spelling, punctuation or grammar. Students demonstrate adequate search strategies to find relevant, scholarly information, including reference to most supplied/recommended readings.

Inadequate

(0 – 19)

Very limited or no understanding of general subject area. Research aims or question is simplistic, vague or confused. Bare familiarity with the appropriate analytical and/or interpretative techniques, but will show substantial errors in the process of analysis or interpretation. Little or no evidence of further reading of secondary materials. Poorly presented, with little or no referencing of sources and an inadequate or absent bibliography. Sketchy style, with significant errors of spelling, punctuation or grammar.

P(19)

  • Among other benefits, we guarantee:
  • Essays written from scratch – 100% original,

  • Timely delivery,

  • Competitive prices and excellent quality,

  • 24/7 customer support,

  • Priority on customer’s privacy,

  • Unlimited free revisions upon request, and

  • Plagiarism free work.

Providing Quality University Papers, written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study

Child Custody Rights Under The Saudi Law: Comparative Study

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic or instructions, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content