online article read discussion 1000 words or more

I’m working on a Psychology question and need guidance to help me study.

1. After reading the online article, “Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California (S. Ct. of CA, 1976)”, briefly discuss your opinion of the “duty to warn” law. In what ways does it protect the victim? In what ways may duty to warn harm the patient? Consider both perspectives in your answer (i.e., protection vs. violation of patient rights). Please keep your response within 1000 to 1500 words.

online article read discussion 1000 words or more