INSTRUCTIONS

Core Assessment – Final Research Report For the core assessment you will write an essay: (max. 2500 words, plus tables and figures). You will choose TWO extended case studies and will write an essay comparing and critically evaluating their ethical challenges and the strategies used to minimize or guard against harmful results. There are three parts to your Core Assessment. Two case studies in which I chose 1. The Mountain People (Turnbull 1974) 2. Effect of Blood on Reaction to a Victim (Piliavin & Piliavin, 1972) The Mountain People Study of a northern Ugandan tribe, the Ik, which in contrast to his previous research, Turnbull asserted were a “group of human beings totally lacking in any ethical code.” The Ik were traditionally nomadic hunters and gatherers, but the government had recently transformed their hunting grounds into a national park and forced them into a sedentary life as farmers in an arid mountain region. Prolonged drought and famine made their predicament desperate. To complicate things further, corrupt government officials regularly redirected food rations supplied by outside aid organizations. Turnbull remained an ostensibly detached and uninvolved observer, but imposed his own ethical code on his write-up, presenting what many consider a biased and insufficiently substantiated account (though it won awards at the time). Effect of Blood on Reaction to a Victim In the Spring of 1964, Kitty Genovese was brutally murdered outside her apartment building in Queens, NYC while 38 onlookers did nothing. In the wake of that incident, Darley and Latane (1968) proposed their theory of “diffusion of responsibility” (or the “bystander effect”), which asserts that a crowd of onlookers are less likely to offer aid to a victim because they feel someone else will get involved. Piliavin and Piliavin thought that there was another factor at work: the perception of risk due to involvement. To test their hypothesis, they conducted a field experiment in the New York subway system. A confederate, dressed as a blind man with dark glasses and a white cane, faked a fainting spell on a moving subway car between stops while researchers recorded bystander reactions. They conducted the experiment 42 times under two conditions: one where the “victim” simply collapsed, and the other where they also appeared to bleed about the mouth. They repeatedly got into trouble with subway officials, ran the risk of a passenger pulling the emergency stop cord, and induced panic among some riders during several of the “blood” trials. CA Part 1- Choosing Two Case Studies Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Case Names Full Marks-Both case studies from approved set are named. 2 points Partial Marks-One Case Study from the approved set is named. 1 point 2 Description Full Marks-Well development description with specific references to weaknesses of both cases 3 points Partial Marks-Fairly development description with specific references to weaknesses of both cases. 2 points 3 Total Points 5 CA Part 2- Outline Rubric Criteria Ratings Points APA 7 ed Application Use of accurate APA 7th edition formatting. Full Marks-High accuracy of APA formatting 2 points Partial Marks Appropriate use of APA formatting with obvious errors. 1 point 2 Outline Quality Quality of the essay outline. Full Marks-High quality with appropriate title on the first page of text body and all 5 headings represented. 2 points Partial or missing components of outline 1 points 2 Reference Page Reference Page included in Outline Full Marks References page in outline with at least one reference. 1 point 1 Total Points 5 Core Assessment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Focus: Personal Voice Full Marks – Refers to the writing style of the paper. Outstanding papers will focus more on the students’ writing/ interpretation/ paraphrasing with no or a few quotes. 5 Ethical Issues: Questionable ethical issues present in BOTH case studies Full Marks Refers to the level and quality of identifying and describing the questionable ethical principles in BOTH case studies. 10 Ethical Strategies: A description of the ethical strategies implemented in BOTH case studies Full Marks Refers to the level and quality of describing the ethical strategies implemented in both case studies. 5 Success of Strategies: How the ethical strategies (if any) used in BOTH case studies were successful. Full Marks Refers to the level and quality of addressing how successful the ethical strategies used in BOTH case studies 5 Alternative Strategies: Proposed strategies that would have addressed ethical issues in BOTH case studies Full Marks Refers to the level and quality of proposed strategies to address ethical issues in BOTH case studies 5 Better implementation: Better implementation of research ethics – contrasting the two case studies Full Marks Refers to the level and quality of addressing which case study better implemented ethical research principles. 10 Mechanics: Grammar/ Usage Full Marks Page Max = 2500 words (10 pages of text body), Included in this is professional writing, e.g., no slang, no contractions, no hedges, no tour guide language, etc. 5 Mechanics: APA Format Full Marks – Based upon APA 7th edition 5 Total Points: 50 points

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Ethical Issues in social science – Core Assessment Research Report

Ethical Issues in social science – Core Assessment Research Report

INSTRUCTIONS

OUTLINE (SUGGESTED) FOCUS ON AREA IN BLUE BOLD AND OTHER AREAS IF FEEDBACK INDICATED YOU LEFT THOSE ASPECTS OUT OF PAPER ONE

SOCIAL PROBLEM

Definition/Dimensions of the Problem

Historical Perspective of the Problem

Contemporary Scope of the Problem

Vulnerable Populations

RELATED SOCIAL POLICY

Overview of Related Social Welfare Policies

Identify any Significant Programs Created due to Policy Mandate

Discussion of any Gaps or Limitations within the Policy

SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEMS ADDRESSING PROBLEM

Description of Relevant Social Services

Levels of Effectiveness in Addressing Problem

Roles of Social Work Professionals in these Systems

CURRENT STATE OF THE SOCIAL PROBLEM

Impact of Policies and Services on Combating the Problem

RECOMMENDATIONS

In Both Policy (development) and Service (expansion) Areas

REFERENCES

Research Paper Requirements:

*The paper will be written using APA style with a required length of 10-12 pages, that includes the last paper. Additionally, it is expected that the paper will have a minimum of 10 scholarly references that includes the sources from the policy analysis paper. This can be done as a rewritten paper or an addendum.

POLICY & SERVICES

Research Paper Guidelines/Rubric

Research Paper Requirements:

The paper will be written using APA style with a required length of 10-12 pages. Additionally, it is expected that the paper will have a minimum of 10 scholarly references. SEE TEXT IN RED

ABOVE.

Grading Criteria (100 points):

1. Consistency with APA style and adherence to suggested paper outline/length as well as effective paper organization, flow and readability (0-10 points)

[10 points would suggest excellent paper organization and compliance with APA Style]

2. Sufficiency of the scholarly references incorporated into the paper both qualitatively and quantitatively (0-10 points)

[10 points would suggest that a comprehensive, timely and effective literature review was completed]

3. Social Problem Description (0-15 points)

[15 points would suggest a comprehensive overview of the social problem with appropriate integration of relevant data]  

4. Overview of Related Social Policy Responses (0-15 points)

[15 points would suggest a comprehensive review of relevant policy responses]

5. Overview of Related Social Program Responses (0-15 points)

[15 points would suggest a detailed review of public and private, non-profit program responses in addressing the social problem]

6. Analysis of Current State of the Social Problem (0-15 points)

[15 points would suggest that an up-to-date and effective analysis was completed]  

7. Policy/Program Recommendations (0-10 points)

[10 points would suggest that a series of timely and thoughtful recommendations were presented and clearly linked to the relevant literature]

8. Citation of References* In-text and on the Reference Page (this includes the appropriate incorporation of original work from the Policy Analysis Paper) (0-10 points). [10 points would suggest that thorough and consistent citation of sources occurred in-text and on the reference page]  

*Failure to appropriately document references within in-text citations will result in an E for the assignment. If you don’t get it by now, you’re not paying attention or don’t care.  

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Social Welfare Research Paper

Social Welfare Research Paper

INSTRUCTIONS

History of Canada’s policy of a war on drugs. What social causes of the adoption of this policy? Social consequences? How did the situation change when marijuana was legalized?

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

History of Canada’s Policy of a War on Drugs.

History of Canada’s Policy of a War on Drugs.

INSTRUCTIONS

Questions (choose one): 1. After reading the content concerning symbolic interaction and dramaturgy (Mead and Goffman), please address the following:

1) analyze the basic tenets of the symbolic interaction perspective, according to the work of GH Mead, paying special attention to the concept of “the self”;

2) Next, explain how the work of Erving Goffman demonstrates key components of the symbolic interaction perspective; and

3) given Goffman’s perspective, do you think it is reasonable to state that an individual person does not have an immutable, unchanging self? Why or why not? Please use specific concepts in your response.

2. Based upon your reading for week number four concerning ethnomethodology,

please address the following:

1) summarize in a concise paragraph the basic tenets that underpin the ethnomethodology viewpoint;

2) explain and give an example of how “documentary interpretation” explains every day social life; and

3) explain in detail why “conversation analysis” is considered to be a part of ethnomethodology. Disclaimer Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.

Course Objectives: This course assessment will evaluate your ability to do the following:

Define sociological theory. Identify and discuss the major social issues that influenced the development of sociological theory.

Identify major bodies of theoretical work in contemporary sociology and the theorists associated with them.

Analyze important developments in sociological theory, including developments in European sociological theory that influenced the growth of theory in the United States.

Summarize historical theories and the manner in which their work continues to hold relevance.

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Contemporary Sociology Essay

Contemporary Sociology Essay

INSTRUCTIONS

Research-informed Paper – APA style, minimum FIVE FULL pages of content, PLUS cover sheet and reference page, for a TOTAL of SEVEN pages. Content will include the following: Investigate the literature for research supported group interventions provided by topics discussed in class and in our textbook. Think of a topic you are passionate about, or something you want to learn more about. **For example, working with children with chronic or terminal health issues, mental health support groups for college students with anxiety and depression, or group work with the elderly, etc. In your paper, you need to discuss: A) Exploration of group types (what types of groups are used based on the research you found?) B) Role of social workers C) Characteristics of the population D) Culture (How does culture impact the issue you have chosen?) E) A summary of the research and the support found in the literature. Paper should be APA style, minimum five FULL pages of content, PLUS cover sheet and reference page for a TOTAL OF SEVEN PAGES. Please use five to seven references and no Wikipedia!

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Working with Children that have Behavioral Issues

Working with Children that have Behavioral Issues

INSTRUCTIONS

The common morality framework is the most effective framework we have discussed this semester for solving ethical dilemmas due to its removal of bias, use of the morally relevant features for fact-gathering, and asking whether the moral rule violation being considered is publicly allowed. Other frameworks from which you have chosen (utilitarianism, deontology, Rawls’ theory of justice, and virtue ethics) are also used very frequently in ethical decision-making. In light of this, you have written a paper describing and applying the common morality and one other framework, describing how they align with the NASW Code of Ethics, and identifying social work practice issues based on one of the provided cases. You will be sharing your Case Application Papers within your small groups this week in order to achieve the following goals: To evaluate the use of the common morality framework & one other framework for solving ethical dilemmas To evaluate how the frameworks align/do not align with the NASW Code of Ethics To evaluate whether the submission uses terminology and thorough descriptions of the chosen frameworks To evaluate the effectiveness of the practice issue discussions To provide critically considered and respectful feedback to other students on the content of their papers To receive and apply feedback from other students on the content of their papers

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Case Study Application

Case Study Application

INSTRUCTIONS

The final exam will consist of 40 questions covering material from the first day of the course to
the last. The format of the questions will be mostly true/false, with some multiple choice
and multiple answer. You will have 50 minutes to complete the test.
When studying for the test, be sure to:
• Review the answers to each and every question in the 15 quizzes. Make sure you know
what the right answers are to each question and why these answers are the correct
ones. Note: In the grades section of blackboard, you will see your grade for each quiz.
The quiz grade itself is a link to the individual question & answers.
• Review the reflection pieces for each day.
• Email me with any questions you have.
Pay particular attention to the following questions:
• Is there more inequality between or within nations?
• Since 1990, has global inequality increased or decreased?
• In which continent is inequality the highest?
• According to Russ Roberts, historically what was the most common way for people to
get richer?
• According to Jared Diamond, what factors were most important in explaining global
income inequality?
• Is it possible to “prove” theories? No! Social theories in particular can not be
proved. Prove is too strong a word to use in this context. Banish it from your vocabulary
in social science.
• What is gross domestic product?
• What is the concept of opportunity cost?
• What is the difference between explanatory questions and descriptive questions?
• What type of study is the gold standard for testing the effectiveness of a policy?
• What is the main cause of economic growth?
• What is an absolute definition of poverty? A relative definition?
• What is the principle of comparative advantage? According to that principle, what
should nations do?
• Which of the following factors is most important for predicting a person’s income —
gender, ethnicity, nation in which they live, IQ?
• According to Hans Rosling, does it still make sense to divide the world into rich nations
and poor nations?
• According to Firebaugh, is it possible for people to live on less than $2 per day?

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.

Why choose us:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Is there More Inequality Between or Within Nations?

Is there More Inequality Between or Within Nations?