Using and Evaluating Research Evidence. Using and Evaluating Research Evidence.
Using and evaluating research evidence
Title: Case study analysis of a source of non-academic evidence
For Assessment Task, you are required to write a 4000-word case study analysis that focuses on one of the following sources of non-academic evidence:
Your case study analysis will need to include the following sections.
1. A general introduction about the selected organisation. This general introduction should describe and explain features such as the organisation’s history and purpose, its focus and main activities, its outputs and audiences, and its sources of funding and governance. It should also explain the organisation’s approach to evidence, and its role within the evidence ecosystem. This section should provide a comprehensive introduction to the organisation, in which its different features are accurately described and explained and well linked together to offer a rich picture. 800 words.
2. A critical analysis of three substantial publications from the selected organisation (avoid short blog posts, PPT slides and research summaries). The critical analysis should: examine the focus, purposes and audiences of each publication, their structure and format, and their findings and recommendations. It should also identify what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each publication in relation to their intended purposes and audiences. In this section, three appropriate publications should be selected and carefully reviewed, showing coverage of the suggested aspects and evidence of critical reading that draws on unit materials. 1200 words.
3. A critical appraisal of the evidence used within each of the selected publications. This critical appraisal should: identify the types of evidence within each publication and explain how they are presented and used; comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence within each publication; and reflect on how well the evidence aligns with the main findings and recommendations of each publication. This section should demonstrate an understanding of different types of evidence and their use, their strengths and weaknesses, and the relationship between evidence and findings, and draw on appropriate terminology and unit materials. 800 words.
4. A conclusion where you reflect on the value of the organisation and its significance for your current or future professional practice. This section should reflect on the selected organisation and its publications in terms of their relevance, value and usefulness to your current or future professional practice. It should also reflect on the pros and cons of the development of organisations like this within education systems. This section should demonstrate a developing understanding of the practical considerations of evidence and its use, and include reflective analysis in relation to specific areas of professional practice and specific pros and cons, with links to ideas within the unit. 800 words.
All of the above sections should be well presented and structured with evidence of effective APA (APA 7th edition) referencing and proof-reading and attention to detail.
Criteria for marking
The marking rubric will be based on the following requirements:
1. A general introduction about the selected organisation (Worth 20%, 10 marks)
HD: A comprehensive range of features of the organisation are accurately described and explained, the organisation’s approach to evidence and its role in the evidence ecosystem is very well explained, and all points made are well linked together to offer a rich picture.
2. A critical analysis of three substantial publications from the selected organisation (Worth 30%, 15 marks)
HD: Three appropriate publications were selected. The analysis covers a comprehensive range of aspects of all of the publications, the points made are insightful and very well explained, and there is strong evidence of in-depth critical engagement. There is highly effective use of unit materials.
3. A critical appraisal of the evidence used within each of the selected publications (Worth 20%, 10 marks)
HD: The appraisal accurately identifies the specific types of evidence within each publication and insightfully discusses how they are used. Strengths and weaknesses of the evidence are explained using appropriate terminology, and the relationship between evidence and findings is carefully considered. There is highly effective use of unit materials.
4. A conclusion where you evaluate the work of that organisation and its significance for your current or future professional practice (Worth 20%, 10 marks)
HD: The conclusion includes insightful reflections on the organisation and its publications, and their relevance to your current or future professional practice. There is insightful discussion of pros and cons of such organisations. The points made are all specific, detailed, well explained, authentic and linked to ideas within the unit.
5. All of the above sections are well presented and structured with evidence of effective APA (APA 7th edition) referencing and proof-reading and attention to detail (Worth 10%, 5 marks)
HD: All sections are very well presented and structured with very clear evidence of effective APA referencing and proof-reading and highly accurate attention to detail.
For a custom paper on the above or a related topic/instructions, place your order with us.
Why choose us:
• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)-
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & PhD. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content
Using and Evaluating Research Evidence
Using and Evaluating Research Evidence