a. How do both interpretation differ? Explain. b. Which interpretation do you find the most convincing-Rotter or McMahon? Why? c. In your opinion, was the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam conflict necessary? Why or why not?

Posted on | by admin

I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.

Carefully read pages in Chapters 30 and 31.1 concerning The Vietnam War, then read the document that follows this instruction, The Vietnam Conflict: Two Views.

Step 2

Consider the 3 questions found below concerning “The Vietnam Conflict: Two Views” for your initial posting in a discussion format (do not repeat the questions) by Wednesday of this Week.

IT MUST BY IN YOUR OWN WORDS, with a word count of 150 to 250 words. I send written work through originality check software. Adhere to proper spelling and grammar rules.

Make sure to express your thoughts in a thoughtful, meaningful way. Use Word spell check before submitting your work. Excess misspelling/grammar errors or generally sloppy work will result in point deduction.

Step 3

Respond to 2 fellow student posts. These postings should also be meaningful in at least 75 to 100 words. Answers such as, “I agree”, “Sounds good”, etc. are unacceptable and will result in a deduction of total possible points for this exercise.

a. How do both interpretation differ? Explain. b. Which interpretation do you find the most convincing-Rotter or McMahon? Why? c. In your opinion, was the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam conflict necessary? Why or why not?

For a custom paper on the above or a related topic or instructions, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 30% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content